This agreement compensated for damages for the pending action of these negotiating partners and their members after unfair labour complaints and political and individual complaints were filed. The employer argues that a large number of lighting stations are accessible by car. Approval of such an amendment would result in financial costs to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and would exceed the provisions of other CPA collective agreements without justification. This proposal represents a cost of more than $48,000 per year and 0.01% of the Sv salary base. From the day the collective agreement is signed, to address the recruitment and retention problems of GL-MAM building systems technicians and technicians, or equivalents in the Operational Services Group (SV). The employer`s proposal also includes the agreement on the implementation of the collective agreement negotiated with all CPA groups and agencies. The employer is open to further discussions with PSAC to reach an agreement on damages to Phoenix, recognizing that PSAC employees are entitled to compensation for damages caused by the Phoenix payroll system. However, the employer respectfully argues that the damages associated with the Phoenix should not influence the deliberations of this committee. This issue is still about to be resolved in another forum, and if the parties fail to reach an agreement, the FPSLREB is the appropriate forum for a third-party solution. The employer also argues that in other CPA collective agreements with similar working conditions (i.e., on board a marine test vessel or marine tax vessel), there are no parking reimbursement provisions, such as the Architecture, Engineering and Land Survey (NR), the Research Group (RE), the Electronics (EL) Group, the Ship (West) , Ship Repair Group (East) SR (E), Ship Repair (All Chargehand and Production Supervisor Employees Located on the East Coast (SR (C)) group and the Ships` Group of Officers. A four-year agreement would allow the parties to more fully implement the changes negotiated during this round. It would also be a better opportunity to stabilize the compensation system before the next collective agreement is implemented. For example, the Ontario government has introduced legislation imposing a maximum of 1% for annual increases in compensation under collective agreements for a period of three years.