A criminal defense attorney in Iowa must also pay attention to cases where parole has been extended beyond the legal deadline. When the application for revocation of parole has been filed after the statutory period has expired, the court loses jurisdiction. If you think your probation officer will say you violated parole, contact an experienced criminal defense attorney in Des Moines at McCarthy-Hamrock, P.C. We represent clients throughout the state of Iowa in cases of probation violations and retraction hearings, including in Polk County, Warren County, Dallas County, Madison County and Guthrie. DRUG TREATMENT COURT (DTC) The Sixth Judicial District Drug Treatment Court Program is a prison diversion program based in Linn County. It is intended to provide intensive community supervision to probation criminals who would be sent to prison if the program did not exist. This program follows the evidence-based practice of targeting high-risk, high-needs offenders with substance abuse and dependence problems. The DTC program is based on the principle of responding to risk needs and holds participants to account for interventions at doses tailored to their risks. DTC participants participate in court hearings as often as they do each week and appear before the judge and a multidisciplinary team of professionals, allowing for a rapid response to problematic behaviours and a timely recognition of positive changes. For more information on low-risk parole in the fifth trial, there is a nationwide movement to abolish technical revocations. It is often argued that probation officers are dismissed for lack of appointments.

This is not the case in Iowa. It`s worth repeating that it`s not going to happen in Iowa. When the application for revocation of probation is made during the probation period, the court generally reserves the jurisdiction to hold a hearing and revoke parole after the end of the initial trial period. See State v. Jensen, 378 N.W.2 710, 712-13 (Iowa 1985). On the other hand, it was recognized that a long delay between issuing and executing an arrest warrant could be unreasonable and that it would be a refusal of an ordinary procedure that would deprive the court of the jurisdiction of a conditional offender. Barker v. State, 479 N.W.2d 275, 278 (Iowa 1991). In the absence of a law requiring a particular form of revocation of the probation order, the courts held that the revocation order should not be in a particular form after a violation of the probation hearing. Nevertheless, the Tribunal should issue sufficient legal advice and conclusions to support the injunction. In addition, the order should indicate the actual basis of the revocation. See Morrissey v.

Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 P.C. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484. Strict rules of evidence in criminal proceedings do not apply to revocation hearings.