In December 2014 (79 FR 76047), DoD established an interim implementation of the final guide entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audits for Federal Prices,” published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on December 26, 2013 in 2 CFR Part 200 (Guidance Uniforme – available at 78 FR 78589). DoD then issued an opinion on the proposed regulations (November 7, 2016 (81 FR 78369) that proposed adding 2 CFR 1120s to establish a standard format for the organization of DoD Start Printed Page 51162Components` and Grant Cooperative Agreement Awards and Them.b) applies to public procurement. This section applies to grants and cooperation agreements with other technology investment agreements (AIT) that are awarded to any type of recipient company. b) does not meet the criteria of p. 1120.600 for a national political requirement. The price title pages include the portion of each DoD component premium of a grant or cooperation agreement, or any change to a premium that the DoD component transmits to the recipient when it makes the premium or modification. They: (1) A statement that the award of arbitration can only be changed by an aid officer. The statement could also explain how changes will be made. The source of national political requirements to be included in a grant or cooperation agreement is 2 CFR, Part 1122. This part of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGARs) defines a standard premium format for DoD Components grants and cooperation agreements. This makes content easier for a recipient to find different doD Components rewards.

One of the objectives of the overall update is to implement guidelines with federal authorities on administrative requirements, cost principles and audit requirements for federal grants, cooperation agreements and other support instruments (2 CFR Part 200). For the same reason as article 1120.515 B, DoD Components is urged to build the portion of its terms and conditions that meets national political requirements for the allocation of all types of recipient institutions, including for-profit organizations, in: a) sub-chapter D of this chapter for grants and bonuses for cooperation agreements to higher education institutions. , non-profit organizations, states, local governments and Indian tribes. Sub-Chapter D contains a standard set of articles in which a DoD component organizes administrative requirements. It also contains standard formulations for the terms and conditions of sale in these items, as explained in the overview of sub-chapter D in 2 CFR, part 1126. b) mentioning possible deviations from this standard word (for example. B, paragraphs added, omitted or revised on the basis of which national policy requirements apply to programs and recipients for which the terms and conditions of sale are applied). b) 32 CFR, Part 34, for grants and cooperative partnership agreements to for-profit companies. This part of the DoDRG defines the administrative requirements for attribution to these companies, but does not contain standard articles or terms and conditions.

(6) The due date (i.e. the date the finance official`s signature) and, if by derogation, the effective date. (b) the requirement for recipients to immediately notify the DoD component when they develop information that they believe could affect national security when disclosed as part of the implementation of projects or programs. (a) which are mandated by a statute, executive order, policy directions of the President`s Executive Office or a regulation specifically dealing with grants, cooperation agreements or grants in general; (1) General conditions for grants and cooperation agreements in universities, non-profit organizations, states, local governments and Indian tribes. These distinctions are subject to the provisions of the DoDGARs: For the first time, there is a uniform implementation of OMB guidelines, national political requirements and doD policy by general conditions.